From Courtrooms to Community Programs: Assessing Juvenile Diversion Effectiveness in Cuyahoga County

Authors

  • Hieu PHAN PhD, Tiffin University, United States
  • Danielle SUTTON Tiffin University, United States

Abstract

This study employed a data-driven analysis to examine juvenile diversion programs designed to redirect adolescents from formal court adjudication toward rehabilitation-oriented interventions. Such programs offer a potential mechanism for reducing recidivism and improving long-term outcomes among at-risk youth. The research specifically evaluated the effectiveness of Cuyahoga County’s Phoenix Court–Behavioral Health Juvenile Justice (BHJJ) diversion initiative by comparing participant outcomes to those of similarly situated adolescents processed through conventional juvenile justice pathways, including probation and secure detention. The Phoenix Court–BHJJ program serves probationary youth presenting with mental health or substance use disorders who are identified as being at elevated risk for reoffending. Rather than utilizing custodial sanctions, the program facilitates engagement with community-based treatment and support networks. Participants are required to attend regular court hearings, engage in weekly therapeutic sessions, and maintain ongoing communication with a court-appointed coordinator. Progress is systematically monitored through a structured framework of incentives and sanctions, with the overarching objective of fostering behavioral stability, addressing individualized needs, and mitigating future justice system involvement. Methodologically, the study applied a case study approach to assess program completion rates, recidivism rates, and additional performance metrics indicative of program efficacy. A comparative analysis was conducted between BHJJ participants and a matched nonparticipant cohort to evaluate differential outcomes. The results of this investigation aim to contribute to the empirical literature on diversion-based interventions, provide evidence-based insights into their rehabilitative impact, and inform policy discourse surrounding the integration of alternative, treatment-focused strategies within juvenile justice reform.

Published

2025-11-23