The Cyberpsychology and Criminal Psychology of Cyber Identity Theft and Criminal Reach in the Digital Era

Authors

  • Darrell Norman BURREL Marymount University, USA; Georgetown University - Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics, USA

Abstract

Identity theft has emerged as a psychologically consequential form of cybercrime enabled by the proliferation of digital platforms, the expansion of datafication, and the collapse of traditional criminal–victim proximity. As personal identity becomes increasingly externalized through financial accounts, medical records, biometric templates, and algorithmically curated social profiles, offenders exploit cognitive biases, disclosure fatigue, and habituated oversharing to acquire and weaponize personal information. Criminal psychology research demonstrates that social engineering, authority mimicry, and emotional urgency manipulate victims into bypassing rational scrutiny, while cyberpsychology highlights the affective attachment individuals form with their digital representations. Unlike conventional theft, in which tangible objects are removed, identity theft appropriates informational components of the self, enabling prolonged impersonation, reputational distortion, and chronic anxiety that cannot be readily restored. Geographic detachment, encrypted communication channels, and anonymizing technologies reduce offenders’ perceived accountability, encouraged moral disengagement and facilitating mass victimization at minimal personal risk. Victims, confronted with unauthorized transactions or corrupted medical histories, report hypervigilance, loss of digital agency, and destabilization of narrative coherence. Emerging technologies, including Internet of Things devices, deepfake media, decentralized finance, and eventually quantum computing, further expand the attack surface and amplify criminogenic opportunity structures. Meanwhile, jurisdictional fragmentation complicates forensic attribution and legal recourse. Collectively, these developments reveal that traditional, place-based models of personal security are insufficient in networked environments. Safeguarding informational sovereignty requires interdisciplinary approaches that integrate behavioral criminology, cognitive vulnerability assessment, cyberpsychological resilience, and international policy coordination. Understanding identity theft as an ontological, relational, and psychologically persistent violation offers critical insight for prevention, victim support, and regulatory design in the digital epoch.

Published

2025-11-23