The Cyberpsychology and Criminal Psychology of Cyber Identity Theft and Criminal Reach in the Digital Era
Abstract
Identity theft has emerged as a psychologically consequential form of cybercrime enabled by the proliferation of digital platforms, the expansion of datafication, and the collapse of traditional criminal–victim proximity. As personal identity becomes increasingly externalized through financial accounts, medical records, biometric templates, and algorithmically curated social profiles, offenders exploit cognitive biases, disclosure fatigue, and habituated oversharing to acquire and weaponize personal information. Criminal psychology research demonstrates that social engineering, authority mimicry, and emotional urgency manipulate victims into bypassing rational scrutiny, while cyberpsychology highlights the affective attachment individuals form with their digital representations. Unlike conventional theft, in which tangible objects are removed, identity theft appropriates informational components of the self, enabling prolonged impersonation, reputational distortion, and chronic anxiety that cannot be readily restored. Geographic detachment, encrypted communication channels, and anonymizing technologies reduce offenders’ perceived accountability, encouraged moral disengagement and facilitating mass victimization at minimal personal risk. Victims, confronted with unauthorized transactions or corrupted medical histories, report hypervigilance, loss of digital agency, and destabilization of narrative coherence. Emerging technologies, including Internet of Things devices, deepfake media, decentralized finance, and eventually quantum computing, further expand the attack surface and amplify criminogenic opportunity structures. Meanwhile, jurisdictional fragmentation complicates forensic attribution and legal recourse. Collectively, these developments reveal that traditional, place-based models of personal security are insufficient in networked environments. Safeguarding informational sovereignty requires interdisciplinary approaches that integrate behavioral criminology, cognitive vulnerability assessment, cyberpsychological resilience, and international policy coordination. Understanding identity theft as an ontological, relational, and psychologically persistent violation offers critical insight for prevention, victim support, and regulatory design in the digital epoch.Published
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: RAIS Journal of Social Sciences is given by the author the right of the first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors retain copyright. If the author cites from his own article published in RAIS Journal of Social Sciences, then he is encouraged to cite the name of the RAIS Journal of Social Sciences, volume, and page. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). This journal provides immediate open access to its content, in this way, we make research freely available to the public and support a greater global exchange of knowledge.
PRIVACY STATEMENT
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.